Maybern Raises $50M Series B led by Battery VenturesWall Street Journal
Sophie Mester, Director of Product at Maybern, has seven years of product experience building B2B software across different industries. Previously, she led the Platform Product team at Orchard (a real estate technology company) and worked on SeatGeek's Enterprise Product team building product solutions for large sport franchises.

Sophie Mester, Director of Product at Maybern, has seven years of product experience building B2B software across different industries. Previously, she led the Platform Product team at Orchard (a real estate technology company) and worked on SeatGeek's Enterprise Product team building product solutions for large sport franchises.

Key Takeaways
  • Hybrid waterfalls let GPs collect carry earlier than European waterfalls. The same flexibility creates clawback risk that compounds across deals as unrealized investments are written down.
  • The Excel-based hybrid waterfall is a key-person bomb: typically one person understands the formula network, and that person becoming unavailable freezes distributions.
  • Determining how much carry you CAN take per the LPA versus how much you SHOULD take per your risk tolerance is a continuous calculation across every realization event, not a quarterly one.
  • Assigning underperforming unrealized deals to specific waterfall tiers is what separates GPs who avoid clawback from GPs who discover it at audit.
  • Investor-specific waterfall terms (different tiers, hurdle rates, opt-out rights, fee structures) multiply complexity until manual calculation becomes operationally infeasible.

Why a Systemized Approach to Waterfall Management Matters

Hybrid waterfalls (sometimes called deal-by-deal waterfalls with a clawback) give fund managers the flexibility to collect carried interest earlier in the fund’s life – a huge benefit to the GP and employees with carry – but they also introduce operational complexity and clawback risk. Most funds handle these calculations in Excel, turning critical financial decisions into manual spreadsheet gymnastics. It’s messy, error-prone, and often leads to unnecessary risk. 

Automating hybrid waterfall calculations transforms fund operations, enabling GPs to make real-time decisions that mitigate clawback risk while still benefiting from earlier carried interest distributions. With proper automation, fund managers can perform subjective decision-making by strategically allocating underperforming unrealized deals to specific tiers, and immediately see how these decisions affect current carry before finalizing distributions,

This strategic approach not only protects GPs financially but also strengthens LP relationships by ensuring accurate, transparent, and auditable distribution calculations. Let's explore the challenges of managing hybrid waterfalls in Excel and how Maybern’s unique approach to waterfall management addresses these challenges.

Challenges With Excel-Based Hybrid Waterfall Management

While hybrid waterfalls offer the significant advantage of allowing GPs to receive carried interest earlier in the fund's life compared to European waterfalls, they also introduce increased operational complexity and risk that is difficult to manage effectively with Excel alone.

Challenges include:

  • Clawback risk management: Perhaps the most critical challenge is balancing GP clawback risk. A clawback situation not only creates financial complications but can permanently damage the viability of hybrid waterfall approaches for future funds, affecting both GP finances and LP relationships. Determining how much carry you can take (per your LPA) vs. how much carry you should take (per your risk tolerance) is a complex exercise to manage in Excel. 
  • Key person risk: Typically, there's only one person who truly understands the Excel file and its complex formulas, creating significant operational vulnerability.
  • Allocation complexities: Tracking the allocation of all historical fund cashflows to deals and calculating the preferred return or other performance hurdles associated with these cash flows is time intensive.
  • Investment filtering: Manually filtering the cashflows included in waterfall calculations each distribution based on the associated investments’ realization or write down status is cumbersome and error prone.
  • Deal expense allocation: Properly attributing fund expenses to specific deals and determining how that allocation impacts amounts owed to each waterfall tier adds another layer of complexity.
  • Investor-specific terms: The complexity multiplies when you have investors with different terms, including different waterfall tiers and hurdle rates, different management fees and investment opt-out rights.
  • Operational fragility: Excel-based waterfalls create a fragile ecosystem of intricate formula networks and manual data integrations that's difficult to review, audit, maintain, and report on.

In a world with increasing LP demand for accuracy and transparency, having a systemized approach to waterfall management that addresses the above challenges is critical.

Maybern's Approach to Hybrid Waterfalls

Given the inherent risks of having a more complicated waterfall managed in Excel, there are substantial benefits to automating the waterfall in a controlled environment. Maybern's platform is built to flexibly handle waterfall calculations that reflect your unique LPAs, in an intuitive, auditable, and easy-to-use workflow.

The Transformative Impact of Automated Hybrid Waterfalls

Beyond the basic mechanics, Maybern’s automated hybrid waterfall solution delivers strategic business advantages that can fundamentally transform how fund managers operate:

  • Subjective Decision-Making: Users can increase any deal-by-deal hurdle (such as Return of Capital or Preferred Return) for early realizations by allocating underperforming unrealized deals to their waterfall, raising the hurdle above the minimum required by the Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) to mitigate clawback risk.
  • Real-Time Impact Assessment: GPs can immediately see how these decisions affect their current carry before finalizing distributions, enabling informed and strategic financial planning.
  • Granular Analysis: Maybern’s platform calculates waterfalls on an investor-by-investor basis, accommodating LPs with different economic structures within the same fund.
  • Improved Auditability & Accuracy: The integrated nature of Maybern’s system means that all necessary inputs (such as each LP’s allocation of historical cashflows and how those cashflows are tagged to Investments) flow into your waterfall calculations automatically – reducing the risk of manual human error.
  • Reduced Operational Burden: Maybern’s solution allows your team to spend less time building, maintaining, and manually integrating all necessary inputs into complex Excel models.

Hybrid waterfalls represent just one example of waterfall complexity that Maybern simplifies. In the coming year, Maybern will expand support for additional waterfall complexities, including multiple waterfalls per fund, split-stream waterfalls where different distribution proceeds follow distinct paths, and cross-waterfall tests that analyze multiple waterfall runs.

Interested in learning more about automating your hybrid waterfalls? Contact us for a demo.

Download Resource
FAQs

Frequently asked questions

Quick reference for this topic.

01

What is a hybrid waterfall in private equity?

A hybrid waterfall combines deal-by-deal distribution mechanics with fund-level catch-up and clawback provisions. The GP receives carried interest on individual realizations as they occur, but the fund maintains a whole-fund reconciliation that adjusts those payments if later deals underperform. The structure rewards GP performance early while preserving LP downside protection.

02

How is a hybrid waterfall different from European or American structures?

European waterfalls calculate carried interest only after the entire fund returns committed capital plus the preferred return, which means the GP waits years for distributions. American (deal-by-deal) waterfalls pay the GP carry on each realization as it occurs. Hybrid sits between the two: deal-by-deal GP payments with a whole-fund safety net that requires the GP to return earlier distributions if subsequent deals miss the hurdle.

03

What creates clawback risk in a hybrid structure?

Clawback risk emerges when early deal exits generate GP carried interest, and later deals underperform enough that the fund's overall return falls below the preferred return hurdle. The GP owes back the difference at fund wind-down. Without continuous reconciliation, GPs can spend distributions that they will be legally required to return years later.

04

Why do hybrid waterfalls break in spreadsheets?

Hybrid calculations require continuous reconciliation between deal-level and fund-level views, recalculated every quarter as new capital activity occurs. Spreadsheets force this logic into cells that must be rebuilt for every new investor side letter, every new realization, and every change to a clawback assumption. Audit teams routinely find errors in spreadsheet hybrid waterfalls during quarterly close reviews.

05

What does it take to automate hybrid waterfall calculations correctly?

The system has to represent waterfall logic as configurable rules rather than cell-by-cell formulas. The same rule set runs deal-by-deal distributions, the whole-fund hypothetical reconciliation, and the clawback exposure calculation every quarter. Outputs need to be traceable to the specific capital event and rule that produced them, which is what makes audit defense cheaper than the spreadsheet alternative.

Simplify your fund operations without simplifying your funds.
Request a Demo
->